El 16/03/2012, a las 16:28, Jeff Hardy escribió: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Hernán Foffani <hfoff...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> Say I want to distribute a smaller (in quantity of files) Python standard >> library. What would you recommend? Pyc the whole library to build a DLL or >> just zip it? Are there any performance difference between the two? Any other >> alternative or best practice? > > I know that some people have pyc'd the standard library in the past, > but with zipimport being so new I don't know if anyone has tried it > yet. I haven't heard from anyone who has, at least. You might have to > give both a try, and if you can let us know the results that would be > very helpful.
I was one of them.. ;-) There were some problems back then with some packages which made me fall back to the standard files distribution. As Slide noted, zipimport makes it very easy now. I might give pyc a shot in the near future. _______________________________________________ Ironpython-users mailing list Ironpython-users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ironpython-users
