On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Pawel Jasinski <pawel.jasin...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just checked, the part in question is covered by MIT.
Oh, that's better. MIT is no problem (once upon a time parts of Mono were LGPL, which is right out). Also, I had assumed that Mono would use native platform libraries for crypto. You know what happens when you assume... :| If anyone wants to copy the Mono versions (licence intact!) and modify them to work standalone (i.e. you don't have to keep the base classes, necessarily, although it might help), *and* update the Python module implementations, I'll make sure it gets in the next release. - Jeff > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Slide <slide.o....@gmail.com> wrote: >> I had asked this question before, but there was some hesitation based on the >> licensing of Mono. I'm not sure if that is an issue anymore. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Pawel Jasinski <pawel.jasin...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Is there any reason not to use code out of mono? >>> It looks like it supports SHA2 and RIPEMD160. >>> https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11703 >>> _______________________________________________ Ironpython-users mailing list Ironpython-users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ironpython-users
