On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Tim Orling <ticot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have no suggestions, but completely agree with the sentiment. In > particular, I would love to see some traction on PEP-380 > <https://github.com/IronLanguages/ironpython3/issues/1>, since that is > the first thing that came up when I tried to use IP3. > > I had a look at the code > <https://github.com/IronLanguages/ironpython3/blob/master/Src/IronPython/Compiler/Ast/YieldExpression.cs>, > but it's not obvious how to proceed, even after looking at the cpython > code > <https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/1fe0fd9feb6a4472a9a1b186502eb9c0b2366326/Python/Python-ast.c#L1982>. > (Hence why jdhardy labels that issue "hard > <http://blog.jdhardy.ca/2013/06/ironpython-3-todo.html>"). > > I at least am willing to step in and help. > Dino had a patch the implements this already; hopefully he still has it somewhere. I thought he had sent it to me but I can't find it. Loosely speaking, Markus is on the right track; IronPython has a system for rewriting ASTs that is already used to implement normal generators and can be re-used for yield from (and also the async/await stuff in PEP-492). - Jeff
_______________________________________________ Ironpython-users mailing list Ironpython-users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ironpython-users
