This came up on the list a few months ago. The consensus was that building off of System.IO.Compression would be the best, and failing that wrapping Zlib.Net should be possible.
You can dig up the old thread for some more details though. -Eric On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Ivan Porto Carrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > Is there any objection against using a wrapper around zlib.net ? > > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 2:27 AM, Michael Letterle < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Wayne Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > A while back I posted a list of external libraries that we needed to > > > implement in order to support gems and Rails. The following summarizes > > the > > > libraries that I've been working on. Could others who are also working > > on > > > these libraries please post a status update? > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > zlib.so: > > > - any progress Michael? > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > Again, please post a status update if you are working on any of these > > > libraries. > > > > > > > > > Cheers, Wayne. > > > > Not yet, I still intend to. Just need to find the time. I've been > > concentrating on learning ruby a bit more first ;) > > > > -- > > Michael Letterle > > [Polymath Programmer] > > http://blog.prokrams.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Ironruby-core mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > >
_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
