John Lam has been pretty clear that IronRuby is Ruby first, .NET interop second. See: http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/145427#644364
" Our primary goal is to run real Ruby programs." On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Philippe Monnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From rbx, I tried to use the classic respond_to? and methods on an object > instance (like I would from fxri). But I am getting an error: > > :0:in `main': undefined local variable or method `methods' for > #<Object:0x0000058>:Object (NoMethodError) > from :0:in `Initialize##222' > > Is the plan for IronRuby to support the core Ruby library or just the .NET > framework> > > Philippe > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > > -- Michael Letterle [Polymath Prokrammer] http://blog.prokrams.com _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
