I agree, RubyForge seems to be woefully underutilized.  It should be
kept up to date and be THE resource for IronRuby development.

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Chris Chandler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are a lot of bugs on the rubyforge tracker system, as well as patches
> for some, and some that have been found invalid.
>
> Can we cleanup rubyforge tracker/patches? Is the tracker being used
> internally by the IronRuby Team? Should we adopt a patching system at least
> socially like rails?
>
>
> For those not used to the rails patch process.
> Basically three community members must comment on the ticket that the patch
> runs for them when applied to the current svn repository.
> This allows the submitter to put a tag on the ticket which puts it in a
> priority 1 report for the core team to apply within the next cycle, usually
> within the next week.
>  There are also other report queues that have corresponding tags so that
> they can clean up bad patch bug combo's.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Chris Chandler
> _______________________________________________
>  Ironruby-core mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>



-- 
Michael Letterle
[Polymath Prokrammer]
http://blog.prokrams.com
_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core

Reply via email to