Ah! Thanks for the clarification, Mike.
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 14:18 -0600, Mike Moore wrote: > I think the issue is vetting the contribution. Microsoft wants to > protect itself and make sure that anything in the "core" hasn't > violated an existing copyright. As I understand it, Microsoft > considers it prohibitivly expensive to ensure that all contributions > aren't already copywritten, which is why they don't accept patches to > the core yet. Once the DLR is stabilized they will allow contributions > to the IronRuby core because it can no longer influence the DLR core. > > On 5/12/08, C.J. Adams-Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey there Shri, > > Do you accept changes provided that the contributor has > assigned > copyright to Microsoft? > > http://lwn.net/Articles/272265/ > http://www.copylaw.com/forms/copyassn.html > > http://www.update.uu.se/~ams/inetutils/gnulib/doc/Copyright/request-assign.changes > > Cheers, > > C.J. > > > On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 11:29 -0700, Shri Borde wrote: > > Hi Oleg, > > > > > > > > You can prevent stack overflow by explicitly maintaining the > recursion > > count. See > > > > http://lists.ironpython.com/pipermail/users-ironpython.com/2007-October/005694.html > for a related thread about IronPython. However, such a fix in IronRuby would > be in IronRuby.dll, and so we could not accept your patch. You could try > patching it for your own version of IronRuby if wanted. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Shri > > > > Want to work on IronPython, IronRuby, F#?Visit > > http://blogs.msdn.com/ironpython > > > > > > > > From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Curt > > Hagenlocher > > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 10:19 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Try IronRuby in your browser > > > > > > > > > > You might want to change your blog entry to say > "OSI-approved Open > > Source license" instead of "GPL-based license" so that you > don't give > > our lawyers a collective heart attack ;). > > > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Oleg Tkachenko > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > I put together some simple version of IronRuby powered "Try > Ruby" [1]. > > This is just night hack, I hope to improve it. > > > > Now, the problem is that anybody can crash it with "def f() > f() end", > > "f()". I mean StackOverflowException, which is really bad on > shared > > ASP.NET hosting. > > > > Any idea if IronRuby can prevent stack overflow? I'm > volunteering to > > contribute an implementation if so. > > > > > > [1] http://www.ironruby.info/ir/ > > -- > > Oleg > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ironruby-core mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ironruby-core mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
