This is really something that the specs should pick up, no? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Lam (IRONRUBY) Sent: Tuesday,13 May 13, 2008 14:25 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] ModuleOps::extended
I have no idea why ... maybe I screwed something up in a merge. In any event, I've put it back in the next release. Thanks, -John > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ironruby-core- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne Kelly > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 10:54 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Ironruby-core] ModuleOps::extended > > > What's happened to ModuleOps::extended in revision 103? > (it appears to have been removed) > > Kernel::extend calls "extended", so modules need a default > implementation. > > Cheers, Wayne. > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
