Our experience with IronRuby and JRuby support in Ruby In Steel has been 
that the main 'problem areas' are debugging (JRuby) and Visual design 
(IronRuby) as these require some degree of direct 'contact' with the 
specific Ruby implementation. Other features such as editing and project 
management are not implementation dependent. I would imagine the same 
would be true for Netbeans. Supporting code-completion/IntelliSense on 
the .NET side of the equation is also a potential problem.

best wishes
Huw

SapphireSteel Software
Ruby and Rails In Visual Studio
http://www.sapphiresteel.com
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core

Reply via email to