I agree, Anders doesn't allow the argument to be so convincing.
However, I generally go 2.0 > 3.0 > Ruby - Ruby still better.... :)
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:36 PM, John Lam (IRONRUBY)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Loved the Borat photo and the Duck!
>
>
>
> But to be fair, your IsCool function could have been written:
>
>
>
> public bool IsCool() { return m_name.Contains("0"); }
>
>
>
> And the new C# 3.0 Property stuff would have let you write:
>
>
>
> public string Name { get; set; }
>
>
>
> I used to use these kinds of arguments for C# 2.0, but Anders keeps on
> making it harder to continue doing so J
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -John
>
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Orion Edwards
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 3:52 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Ironruby-core] Presentation
>
>
>
> I recently gave a presentation about IronRuby to my local .NET user group.
>
> As none of them knew anything about ruby it's about 2/3'rds introduction to
> ruby and 1/3'rd talking about IronRuby and the DLR specifically.
>
> As part of this I also built a small project which is basically "IRB in your
> winforms app".
> I found it to be a really effective way of showing off :-)
>
> I've posted links on my blog for the members of the local DNUG to have a
> look, but I figured other IronRubyists might be interested, so if you are,
>
> Link to blog entry showing presentation slides
>
> Link to blog entry explaining interactive console thing
>
> Cheers, and thanks to all the IronRuby team for all their hard work :-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
