Now wait just a minute.... :)
You can't casually mention "IronRails changes look good" on the list without any indication of what IronRails is. That sounds far too exciting to pass up. Can someone explain what this might be to us non MSofties? -Eric On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Ruby and IronRails changes are good. > The call to Handler.HandleFile could go outside of the Rails lock as > there's no Ruby code invoked. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tomas Matousek > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 10:46 AM > To: IronRuby External Code Reviewers; DLR Code Reviews > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Code Review: IronRails2 > > tfpt review "/shelveset:IronRails2;REDMOND\tomat" > > Contains a simple change in DLR. > > Ruby changes: > Improves IronRails - switches to IIS7 integrated mode, adds a log, > implements static file handling. > Updates Ruby HAPI. > Fixes writing to text streams (\n should be replaced by \r\n). > Ruby console host exposes the current Ruby engine via "iron_ruby" variable > int the console scope. > > Tomas > > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core >
_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
