Thanks Curt! I'll be waiting for. :)
2008/12/16 Curt Hagenlocher <cu...@microsoft.com>: > IronRuby is still in "alpha". CLR interop is a place we know is still > particularly weak. IronPython just released version 2.0, and is considerably > more mature. If your goal is to have a fairly polished dynamic language that > runs on .NET, then IronPython is probably a better choice. If you like Ruby > and don't mind a few hiccups, then your willingness to file problem reports > for issues that you find will be of great help to us. > > Things are likely to be a bit slow over Christmas, but I'll see if I can get > this fixed before the end of the year. > > -----Original Message----- > From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org > [mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Gabriel Rotar > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 12:49 PM > To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Xna+IronRuby+RubyNewb=headache > > Dudu Baião wrote: >> The IronRuby it's not passing correctly the parameters for the super >> class methods. > > That is a bummer :( > Hopeful IronRuby will improve over time. > > Guess I'll try with IronPython > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
