Hi
I'm observing the following behavior when I try to implement a CLR interface
with generic method definitions.
So let's say an interface contains the following method definition
public interface IRubyEngine {
T CreateInstance<T>(RubyClass rubyClass);
}
in ruby
class MyEngine
include IRubyEngine
end
So far so good nothing has actually been created yet.
MyEngine.new => raises
(master) ยป ir
IronRuby 0.4.0.0 on .NET 2.0.50727.4918
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
>>> require 'bin/System.Web.Mvc.IronRuby.dll'
=> true
>>> class MyEngine
... include System::Web::Mvc::IronRuby::Core::IRubyEngine
... end
=> MyEngine
>>> MyEngine.new
mscorlib:0:in `_TermCreateClass': Method 'ExecuteFile' in type
'IronRuby.Classes.Object$1' from assembly 'Snippets.scripting,
Version=0.0.0.
0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' does not have an implementation.
(System::TypeLoadException)
from mscorlib:0:in `CreateTypeNoLock'
from mscorlib:0:in `CreateType'
from
c:\tools\ironruby\ndp\fx\src\core\microsoft\scripting\Actions\DynamicMetaObjectBinder.cs:96:in
`Bind'
from
c:\tools\ironruby\ndp\fx\src\core\microsoft\scripting\Actions\CallSiteBinder.cs:79:in
`BindDelegate'
from :0
>>> exit
in the console output above it complains about a different method but the
idea is the same. that method def was T ExecuteFile<T>(string path, bool
throwIfNotExist);
Do I put this on codeplex or is that the expected behavior?
---
Met vriendelijke groeten - Best regards - Salutations
Ivan Porto Carrero
Blog: http://flanders.co.nz
Twitter: http://twitter.com/casualjim
Author of IronRuby in Action (http://manning.com/carrero)
_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
