Mohammad Azam wrote: > > The context of "19 years old" fails since it requires to put the > "voting" context as a shared example which I don't want to do. If we can > just call other contexts within the parent context then it would be > great. I think it would be great if the above example just works.
I'm not quite sure what you're expecting in this case. I can understand if you are expecting the parent context to be passed down to the child, but the code: it "should be able to vote" # does not work Is only saying "here is a description about what I want to test... I'm getting ready to test something.... and ... nothing" I'd imagine based on a conversation we had that you "might" be expecting the implicit method calling/subject setup mentioned in the post here: http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/2009/01/13/rspec-1-1-12-is-released/ However, for that, you'd actually need the following syntax (which is probably using some magic shortcuts behind the scenes): it { should be_able_to_vote } You'd also need to add (perhaps monkey-patch if you're dealing with an existing C# dll) the method that RSpec will be looking for (namely: able_to_vote? ) Since you already have CanVote, you could actually just alias it like this: class Person alias_method :able_to_vote?, :CanVote end Let us/me know if this helps, and how far you get from here If you'd like to discuss further personally, please email or direct message me. Thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
