+1 to Ivan's list, as well as good documentation and samples of CLR interop.
I think item 3 is really important as we'll want a production-ready version
of Ruby. If it's slower than MRI, I'm not sure that will sell very well
given all the talk about performance problems with MRI already, whether true
or false. I think it would be best if it were even marginally faster, but so
long as it's not slower, it should be fine.


Ryan
_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core

Reply via email to