Still gets an error unfortunately.
I've tried this
System::Threading::Thread.new do |x,y|
begin
# call COM code
rescue => ex
puts ex
end
end
and this
System::Threading::ThreadPool.queue_user_work_item lambda{ |x| # call COM
code }
and the error happens in both occurrences :-(
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Curt Hagenlocher <[email protected]>wrote:
> The CoInitializeSecurity settings are thread-specific. If you create a
> new thread and do all the COM work on that, do you get the same error?
>
>
>
> I seem to recall discovering that there was something about the
> AssemblyResolve hook that forced COM to be initialized.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Orion Edwards
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 12, 2009 6:00 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [Ironruby-core] COM security question
>
>
>
> I'm having a go at automating Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2 using the
> COM API's via IronRuby.
>
>
>
> Virtual Server requires the COM security level to be set to 'Impersonation'
> or higher (as mentioned here
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa367595(VS.85).aspx )
>
>
>
> The sample code is missing from that particular MSDN page, but essentially
> what it does is call CoInitializeSecurity as follows
>
>
>
> CoInitializeSecurity(IntPtr.Zero,
>
> -1,
>
> IntPtr.Zero,
>
> IntPtr.Zero,
>
> (uint)RpcAuthnLevel.PktPrivacy,
>
> (uint)RpcImpLevel.Impersonate,
>
> IntPtr.Zero,
>
> (uint)EoAuthnCap.DynamicCloaking,
>
> IntPtr.Zero);
>
>
>
> I've created a small C# wrapper dll which does that, but when I try to call
> it from within IronRuby, the following exception occurs:
>
>
>
> :0: Security must be initialized before any interfaces are marshalled or
> unmarshalled. It cannot be changed once initialized. (Exception from
> HRESULT: 0x80010119) (System::Runtime::InteropServices::COMException)
>
>
>
> This implies that IronRuby is doing some COM or marshalling stuff
> internally, and it's too late for me to call CoInit.
>
>
>
> Thus far, I'm stumped - Is there anything I can do to work around this?
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot, Orion.
>
>
>
> PS: I'm using IronRuby 0.9. I've been really impressed by the performance
> improvements since earlier versions, congratulations on all the good work so
> far. Just need to improve the startup time and it'll be awesome!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
