There are not two copies, one is ruby stdlib, and one is IronRuby's  
own lib. The ruby stdlib contains pieces implemented in ruby, as well  
as C. In IronRuby we ported all the C stuff to C# (that's what  
IronRuby.Libraries.dll is), and redistribute the ruby code. So both  
directories are all part of the standard library.

For Silverlight, I would suggest you only deploy the files that you  
use; the entire stdlib is fairly large.

~Jimmy
Sent from my phone

On Oct 12, 2009, at 3:26 PM, "Zoltan Toth" <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote:

> Once again thanks, we were able to get things working.  Please note  
> that
> we have offline requirements that require us to deploy the portions of
> the ruby standard library that we require, within our Silverlight
> application.
>
> My only other question is why does IronRuby ship with what appears  
> to be
> two versions of the Ruby standard library?  There appears to be a
> standard implementation (i.e. \lib\ruby\1.8 for IronRuby 0.9.1) that
> uses ruby scripts and there also appears to be an implementation that
> calls into the CLR (i.e. \lib\IronRuby) in order to do its stuf.  Do  
> we
> have a choice of which to use or do we need to deploy both?
>
> Many thanks for your help.
>
> Zoltan.
> -- 
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core

Reply via email to