Hi Tomas, No success so far, all variants produce the same exception: "InvalidOperationException: Empty scope has no global scope." ???
I tried following variants: Engine.Operations.InvokeMember(null, "require", PathProvider.MapPath(path)); Engine.Operations.InvokeMember(Context, "require", PathProvider.MapPath(path)); Engine.Operations.InvokeMember(Context.TopGlobalScope, "require", PathProvider.MapPath(path)) Engine.Operations.InvokeMember(Engine, "require", PathProvider.MapPath(path)) Engine.Operations.InvokeMember(Engine.Runtime.Globals, "require", PathProvider.MapPath(path)) Engine.Operations.InvokeMember(Engine.GetScope(null), "require", PathProvider.MapPath(path)) with: Engine = Ruby.GetEngine(Runtime); Context = Ruby.GetExecutionContext(Engine); CurrentScope = Engine.CreateScope(); Operations = Engine.CreateOperations(); Any ideas what's wrong? Hope for some help, Immo Tomas Matousek wrote: > “The extension method RequireFile for ruby does that respect when I > would redefine the require statement to keep track of classes contained > in a file and reload them on each request when compiled in debug mode?” > > No, there is no dynamic invocation of “require” method going on. If you > need to call “require” you can use Engine.Operations.InvokeMember(nil, > “require”, fileName); -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
