Considering we have access to the AST.. I would think that.. in theory at least, it would be EASIER to implement than CRuby...
But yeah, what Jimmy said :) On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Jimmy Schementi < jimmy.scheme...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > Any ideas on this? It's using Ruby2Ruby and ParseTree. Is it because it's > > based around C extensions? Anyone know how to do it on the CLR? > > http://parsetree.rubyforge.org/ > > ParseTree hooks into MRI's internals and exposes the parse tree for a given > chunk of Ruby code. For this to work on IronRuby you'd have to rewrite the > C-extension-portion of this library to look at the DLR trees (may require > changes to ironruby as well to expose the tree, but I'm not sure). > > Ruby2Ruby is just a Ruby parser written in Ruby, but depends on racc, which > uses a C extension, though it seems like you can run racc without it. > > ~Jimmy > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > -- Michael Letterle IronRuby MVP http://blog.prokrams.com
_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
