+1 for 1.9 Once you consider that by the time IronRuby claims 1.8.7 compat Ruby will likely have a 1.8.9, I think going for 1.9 just makes the most sense. Everything else is moving or has moved to 1.9, so I'd rather see that happen.
Ryan Riley Email: ryan.ri...@panesofglass.org LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanriley Blog: http://wizardsofsmart.net/ Twitter: @panesofglass Website: http://panesofglass.org/ On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Mark Rendle <m...@markrendle.net> wrote: > Mainly Rails 3.0 compatibility. I'd far rather 1.9.x than 1.8.7, but not at > the expense of Rails compatibility taking longer. > > Mark > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Jim Deville <jdevi...@microsoft.com>wrote: > >> Along these lines: >> >> >> >> Are you interested in the 1.8.7 features, or just things like Rails compat >> (which 1.9.x compat would give) >> >> >> >> JD >> >> >> >> *From:* ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto: >> ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] *On Behalf Of *Orion Edwards >> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:52 AM >> >> *To:* ironruby-core@rubyforge.org >> *Subject:* Re: [Ironruby-core] MRI 1.8.7 compatibility >> >> >> >> +1 ! >> >> Any idea how long after the 1.0 RTM we might start seeing 1.8.7 (or >> 1.9.x?) compatibility? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ironruby-core mailing list >> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > >
_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
