Interesting to know though. Thanks for sharing! JD
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Shri Borde Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:14 AM To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RCov Just noticed that RCov can work in pure Ruby mode without the C-based core known as “rcovrt”. The pure Ruby mode is two orders of magnitude slower. Just FYI. There is still the issue that it will not profile .NET code… From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Shri Borde Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:53 AM To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RCov The core is C-based. Most of it is in Ruby. This is just similar to ruby-debug which also has a small C-based core. Both would need a small hook from IronRuby. So its certainly feasible to support it, but at this point, it will be post-1.0 However, you would only get coverage for Ruby code. For profiling .NET code, you have to use .NET profilers like the one in VS. From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jim Deville Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:34 AM To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RCov I think rcov is c-based ☹ JD From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Riley Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:12 AM To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org Subject: [Ironruby-core] RCov I know everyone is using IronRuby for their testing, but what about code coverage? Has anyone tried RCov with a .NET app? Ryan Riley Email: ryan.ri...@panesofglass.org<mailto:ryan.ri...@panesofglass.org> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanriley Blog: http://wizardsofsmart.net/ Twitter: @panesofglass Website: http://panesofglass.org/
_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
