Yup, thats what it appears. I'm willing to work on either, just depends
on what people's needs are. I personally would be prefer just pushing
forward with 1.9 support but I don't know the state of 1.9 vs 1.8.7 support.
-Zac
On 4/24/2010 12:57 PM, Will Green wrote:
Looks like we'll need an IronRuby 1.0.1 that brings us up to 1.8.7.
Unless we can get to 1.9 faster...
--
Will Green
http://hotgazpacho.org/
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Zac Brown <z...@zacbrown.org
<mailto:z...@zacbrown.org>> wrote:
Saw this earlier today, might be something to think about in the
near future for IronRuby and compatibility.
http://blog.segment7.net/articles/2010/04/23/ruby-1-8-6-policy
-Zac
_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org <mailto:Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org>
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
