That's pretty odd given that there is code to transparently use CWT instead of Dictionary<WR, object>.
I was hoping for to use IR to benchmark my current implementation of CWT on mono. :( On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Tomas Matousek <tomas.matou...@microsoft.com > wrote: > No, IronRuby still uses a custom weak table, which doesn’t work properly in > all scenarios. > > > > Tomas > > > > *From:* ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto: > ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] *On Behalf Of *Rodrigo Kumpera > *Sent:* Thursday, May 06, 2010 9:44 AM > *To:* ironruby-core@rubyforge.org > *Subject:* [Ironruby-core] IronRuby usage of ConditionalWeakTable > > > > Hey folks, > > > > I downloaded DLR from dlr.codeplex.com a few days ago and IR was not > properly using CWT to store properties on CLR objects. > > > > Has this been fixed? > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > >
_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
