How do we want to handle things that CAN be worked around in Mono before they're patched then?
I agree that the same binaries should run in either location, but Mono necessarily is always playing catchup. Unless we target Mono.... >.> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Tomas Matousek <tomas.matou...@microsoft.com> wrote: > I think we should not have any #if MONO conditionals. That would mean we’d > need a different set of binaries for Mono, Moonlight, etc. almost doubling > the number of flavors we have today (desktop CLR, Silverlight 4, Silverlight > 3). > > Now that Mono 2.8 is released we can use memory mapped files (it wasn’t > available when I wrote this code). We don’t need to use P/Invokes anymore. > I have the V4 implementation somewhere almost working so I might be able to > check it in soon. > > > > Tomas > > > > From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org > [mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Andrius Bentkus > Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 10:12 AM > > To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Compiling on Mono? > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Joe Scott <joseph_scott...@msn.com> wrote: > > Doing a google search I found this. > > I have not had a chance to try it out maybe this would work. > > http://groups.google.com/group/DotNetDevelopment/msg/ba5e2bd42ecb83e3 > > > > It is really possible, I guess I was too lazy to do the search myself, > thanks for googling :) > > > > > > ________________________________ > > Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:31:08 +0200 > From: andrius.bent...@rwth-aachen.de > To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Compiling on Mono? > > > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Alistair Bush <ali_b...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> I got it compiling, there is a missing reference for Mono.Posix, one bad >> cast and you need to use CCI in the constants. Does someone know what CCI >> should be? > > patches would be nice :) > > > > I can't patch the csproj with the missing reference because it would break > building on windows. Creating another set of csproj for the a mono build > would be madness. Do csproj'ects support something like ifdef or is it > possible to include a reference only when mono is used? > > And the other change I made was a one liner, I don't think that attaching an > entire patch is is really necessary for it. Just run xbuild with CCI: xbuild > /property:TreatWarningsAsErrors=false /property:DefineConstants="DEBUG MONO" > Ruby.csproj > > and look at the warning outputs... O for god sake, I'll just attach it. > I used this branch: http://github.com/mletterle/ironruby/tree/linux as the > base. > > > > _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > > There is just another question, maybe one of the former developers will > know, why are there 2 build systems now? Why is there a *.build.csproj for > every *.csproj? Isn't that redudant like the suggested rakefiles? > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > > -- Michael Letterle IronRuby MVP http://blog.prokrams.com _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
