Hey, On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Tomas Matousek <tomas.matou...@microsoft.com> wrote: > 2) It might be possible to split the repo to 3 parts – IronRuby > specific, IronPython specific, and DLR, make a submodule for each and > combine those submodules into “DynamicLanguages” repo. So what’s exactly the > effective difference among the repo built this way and 1)?
The difference is that it then becomes easier for people that are only interested in either IronPython or IronRuby to track commits. There will be a timeline for each modules. And you get to follow the ones you're interested in. And if you're only interested in one, your timeline isn't «polluted» with comments or commits from the others. Jb _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
