There may be a plugin for Gallio not sure... On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Gøran Hansen <m...@goeran.no> wrote: > I can't find an integrated VS test runner for RSpec. Maybe I didn't look > hard enough? But it seems to me that it's missing. > Is this something that would be useful? If so, do you have any ideas for > implementation? I think it would be wise to go for the low hanging fruit in > the first version. For instance just make a Command in VS, and execute ir > spec_file.rb and output it in the Output window in Visual Studio. When it's > a command, it's possible to assign a keyboard shortcut to execute the specs. > Gøran > > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Gøran Hansen <m...@goeran.no> wrote: >> >> Tomas, >> >> Thanks for getting back at me. I think it would be wise to start with >> something that I know. I’ve written a plugin for VS2010 before, and feel >> quite comfortable doing that, even though it’s a large and complex >> environment. >> >> I’ll check out the IronRuby VS integration as it is. >> >> What I like about programming Ruby Netbeans and RubyMine is that they have >> a built in test runner for RSpec. Is there an RSpec test runner for VS and >> IronRuby? If not, that would be a fun task to start with :) >> >> >> >> Gøran >> >> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Tomas Matousek >> <tomas.matou...@microsoft.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Gøran, >>> >>> Good to see your interest. >>> >>> >>> >>> The Wiki might be a bit out of date. Some areas that need work and >>> nobody’s working on them afaik (if anyone works on it, speak up) are >>> >>> - Complex and Rational numbers (new to 1.9): to make stuff work >>> I took 1.8 implementations and loaded them to emulate builtin Complex and >>> Rational classes. This is a big hack. We need to implement these classes in >>> C# in the standard libraries. To support .NET interop the implementation >>> should also convert to the existing Complex type on the platform. This is a >>> good task for someone who likes hacking numbers. >>> >>> - Related one: although BigDecimal class is implemented it feels >>> like it needs some perf improvements – I noticed some specs are running >>> quite slower than MRI. There are also some failing specs in BigDecimal (and >>> BigNum) that would be good to fix so that we have fully compatible >>> implementation. >>> >>> - If you are into cryptography one big missing piece is OpenSSL >>> implementation. There might be pieces that you can share with IronPython’s >>> ssl library implementation. >>> >>> - Then there is bunch of misc failing specs that need to be >>> fixed. One big area is ARGF but there are many others as well. See >>> External.LCA_RESTRICTED\Languages\IronRuby\mspec\ironruby-tags-19. >>> >>> - If you were more interested in compiler and runtime you can >>> look into implementing nested method parameters and optional block >>> parameters. This is quite tricky though you need to really understand how >>> the runtime works to implement it correctly. >>> >>> - VS integration always needs improvements. The VS is quite >>> complex environment so it takes a while to learn how it works. >>> >>> >>> >>> Then there is FFI implementation going on – maybe it needs some help? >>> >>> >>> >>> Let me know if you have any questions. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Tomas >>> >>> >>> >>> From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org >>> [mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Gøran Hansen >>> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 12:31 AM >>> To: IronRuby Group >>> Subject: [Ironruby-core] Contributions >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi there >>> >>> I would love to contribute to this open source project. I’ve been >>> learning Ruby for the last year, and I’ve fallen in love with the language. >>> It’s not in my way, it’s fun and productive. >>> >>> I’ve been a .NET developer for too many years, and it was really fun to >>> experience such a great language as Ruby outside the .NET world. >>> Nevertheless, I would love to be able to run Ruby upon the .NET runtime, >>> especially in my projects at work. For me to be able to use it in real world >>> projects, it has to become faster and more stable. My employer is a big fan >>> of standardization and well known solutions. They wouldn’t go for anything >>> except Java or .NET. I’m sure they don’t mind what language we use, but they >>> do care about the platform. >>> >>> How can I help? Are the Contribution ideas still >>> valid? http://github.com/ironruby/ironruby/wiki/Contribution-Ideas >>> >>> When things ended as they did, and Microsoft stopped to support the Iron* >>> languages, I was really happy how they made the handover to the community. >>> With Miguel and his team in charge, I’m sure this is going to end well. I >>> believe there are many .NET developers out there that would love to be able >>> to run Ruby code in .NET. >>> >>> Hope to hear from you soon! >>> >>> -- >>> Gøran Hansen >>> Aspiring Software Craftsman >>> Microsoft Regional Director >>> >>> http://twitter.com/goeran >>> http://goeran.no >>> m...@goeran.no >>> +47 452 39 113 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ironruby-core mailing list >>> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org >>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Gøran Hansen >> Aspiring Software Craftsman >> Microsoft Regional Director & MVP >> >> http://twitter.com/goeran >> http://goeran.no >> m...@goeran.no >> +47 452 39 113 > > > > -- > Gøran Hansen > Aspiring Software Craftsman > Microsoft Regional Director & MVP > > http://twitter.com/goeran > http://goeran.no > m...@goeran.no > +47 452 39 113 > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > >
-- Michael Letterle IronRuby MVP http://blog.prokrams.com _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
