Thanks for that.

After the code review comments about Exception#== I was running the 
Exception specs. 3 fail against ruby 1.9.2p290 (2011-07-09) [i386-mingw32]

I don't have access to a linux/mac system at work to check if they pass on 
non-windows platforms, but it doesn't look like there's anything platform 
related in those errors, so I'd doubt it.

Random comment:
It appears that there's a lot more work to be done in IronRuby 
particularly relating to Errno and SystemCallErrors - I could do this 
work, but there's a blocking problem:
 - Various bits of IronRuby core code call helper methods such as 
RubyExceptions.CreateEINVAL, RubyExceptions.CreateEEXIST, etc, etc. These 
are supposed to return Errno::EINVAL, but they can't, because the Errno 
classes are defined in IronRuby.Libraries and the RubyExceptions.CreateXYZ 
methods are defined in IronRuby.dll. We'd have to move the Errno stuff out 
of Libraries and into IronRuby.dll I think



From:   Tomas Matousek <tomas.matou...@microsoft.com>
To:     "ironruby-core@rubyforge.org" <ironruby-core@rubyforge.org>
Date:   01/11/2011 10:16 a.m.
Subject:        Re: [Ironruby-core] RubySpecs
Sent by:        ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org



1) Partly. We are in progress of updating them. Since we?ve added more 
specs and sometimes corrected existing ones this needs to be done with 
care. The current progress is captured here:
 
https://gist.github.com/1159998
 
After we are done with this process of bringing the specs up to date we 
can submit a path to RubySpec containing the changed we made. The plan is 
also to make the RubySpec dir a submodule so that merging with RubySpec is 
easier.
 
2) Or maybe we should just remove MRI completely? You can always use one 
on your system. I need to check if we need CRuby for anything in the 
infrastructure.
 
3) Well, that would be a question for RubySpec maintainers. I found some 
specs be failures Windows specific, which means the specs are not properly 
written. Feel free to contribute to RubySpecs git repo ? I bet they are 
happy to accept fixes.
 
4) Well, you need to figure out if the behavior makes sense. If it doesn?t 
feel free to file a bug on CRuby and let them decide if the behavior is 
intentional or not. Then CRuby might get fixed, specs might get fixed, or 
IronRuby might get fixed.
 
 
Which specs particularly are you working on? Is it marshal related? 
 
Tomas
 
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [
mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Orion Edwards
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 1:19 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: [Ironruby-core] RubySpecs
 
I've just run mspec under the Languages\Ruby\Tests\mspec\rubyspec\core 
folder against MRI 1.9.2p0 (which is checked into the ironlanguages-main 
git repo), and it crashes with a segfault in putc_spec.rb 

I then tried running against MRI 1.9.2p290 and I get the following: 

       1518 files, 9618 examples, 28229 expectations, 339 failures, 256 
errors 

Running against the dev build of IronRuby stalls running tests in the 
array subfolder, so I can't even complete the run. 

I'd like to try fixing some of the spec failures that IronRuby has, but 
these results raise several questions: 

1. Are the specs in the mspec\rubyspec folder up to date? How would 
someone find this out and/or update them? 
  - Also, I added a few specs the other day for the marshalling code. Do 
these need to somehow get pushed upstream into some "master" rubyspec 
repository?? 

2. Shouldn't we check the latest build of MRI into the ironlangauges 
git-repo? Either the latest 1.9.2 or the just-released 1.9.3 instead? 

3. Isn't MRI the "definitive" ruby? How can the specs be failing against 
MRI? 

4. If I update some IronRuby code to pass the specs, how do I know that 
the specs are even correct? 

Thanks, Orion_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core

_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core

Reply via email to