Of course this is relevant to the IRTF as well.

Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: [email protected]
> Date: December 1, 2015 at 2:53:33 GMT+1
> To: [email protected], [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
> Subject: RFC 7704 on An IETF with Much Diversity and Professional Conduct
> 
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> 
> 
>       RFC 7704
> 
>       Title:      An IETF with Much Diversity
>                   and Professional Conduct
>       Author:     D. Crocker, N. Clark
>       Status:     Informational
>       Stream:     Independent
>       Date:       November 2015
>       Mailbox:    [email protected],
>                   [email protected]
>       Pages:      18
>       Characters: 41359
>       Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
> 
>       I-D Tag:    draft-crocker-diversity-conduct-06.txt
> 
>       URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7704
> 
>       DOI:        http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7704
> 
> The process of producing today's Internet technologies through a
> culture of open participation and diverse collaboration has proved
> strikingly efficient and effective, and it is distinctive among
> standards organizations.  During the early years of the IETF and its
> antecedent, participation was almost entirely composed of a small
> group of well-funded, American, white, male technicians,
> demonstrating a distinctive and challenging group dynamic, both in
> management and in personal interactions.  In the case of the IETF,
> interaction style can often contain singularly aggressive behavior,
> often including singularly hostile tone and content.  Groups with
> greater diversity make better decisions.  Obtaining meaningful
> diversity requires more than generic good will and statements of
> principle.  Many different behaviors can serve to reduce participant
> diversity or participation diversity.  This document discusses IETF
> participation in terms of the nature of diversity and practical
> issues that can increase or decrease it.  The document represents the
> authors' assessments and recommendations, following general
> discussions of the issues in the IETF.
> 
> 
> INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
> It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
> this memo is unlimited.
> 
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
> https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
> 
> For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
> For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html
> 
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to [email protected].  Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
> 
> 
> The RFC Editor Team
> Association Management Solutions, LLC
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to