bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful
=== News Update ===
White terrorists don't make news in the UK
By: stopwar/Burnley Citizen on: 07.10.2006 [11:15 ] (1562 reads)
If this was a muslim man, half of Burnley would have been cordoned off, and it would have been all over our media for days. But in this case... silence.
This is like the cases here in the US of Irv Rubin (who was arrested for plotting to blow up a US Congressman) and Dr. Robert Goldstein (caught with maps to 30 Mosques and enough explosives to destroy most of them), neither of which were ever referred to as "terrorists" in those very few US media stories that even bothered to report the arrests.
Ex-BNP man faces explosives charge
By Andrew Hewitt
If this was a muslim man, half of Burnley would have been cordoned off, and it would have been all over our media for days.
But in this case... silence. Could Jack Straw have been creating a smokescreen with his rant about veils, one wonders - sw
A FORMER British National Party member has been accused of possessing the largest amount of chemical explosives of its type ever found in the country.
Robert Cottage, 49, of Talbot Street, Colne, appeared before Burnley magistrates charged with possession of an explosive substance.
Cottage was charged under the Explosives Substances Act 1883 on Monday night after forensic experts searched his home, allegedly discovering chemical components which could be used to make explosives.
Police sealed off Cottage's home last Thursday and finished their search at the weekend.
Officers claim that their find is the largest haul of chemicals of its kind discovered in someone's home in the country.
However, the exact nature of the chemicals has not been revealed.
David Leach, representing Cottage made no application for bail.
Magistrates remanded Cottage in custody and referred his case to Burnley Crown Court where he is due to appear later this month.
Cottage, a sub-contracted driver for Lancashire County Council, stood for the BNP in the May elections in the Vivary Bridge ward of Colne.
l Police were yesterday searching a house in Trent Road, Nelson, where a 62-year-old-man was arrested in connection with the investigation.
He was last night being quizzed by detectives (link: http://www.burnleycitizen.co.uk/news/newsheadlines/display.var.951775.0.exbnp_man_faces_explosives_charge.php )
******
Compare with this fact :
OLD TRAFFORD
by Lambros on 07.10.2006 [19:41 ]
This is the first time I have read about this compared it to Old Trafford in 2004 when the British people were alerted to an amazing coup.
They learned how the police had seized a terrorist gang just as it prepared to launch an audacious bomb attack on Old Trafford stadium on match day, an attack which could have killed thousands of people.
It was a national sensation.
And yet there was not a shred of truth in the story.
The police and, to an extent the media, are responsible for the invention.
On the morning of Monday 19 April 2004, more than 400 officers from four police forces, many of them armed, raided half a dozen houses, flats and businesses in and around Manchester.
They arrested eight men, one woman and a 16-year-old boy.
They were held for several days and intensively interrogated. In due course the suspects were released.
No charges were ever laid.
The newspapers, by contrast, had no doubt about what the story was.
The front page of The Sun proclaimed: "MAN U SUICIDE BOMB PLOT".
On pages four and five the paper claimed: "EXCLUSIVE: MAN UTD SUICIDE BLASTS FOILED".
Once the story had started to run, it was further fuelled by the Manchester police. Rather than issue a cool denial, they played it up by holding a press conference. The accompanying press release read: "We are confident that the steps that we have taken to date have significantly reduced any potential threat in the Greater Manchester area."
With the weekend fixtures looming, it went on: "Greater Manchester Police and Manchester United Football Club have put in place extra security measures to reassure the public about the safety of both matches."
One of the suspects, a Kurd, suffered so badly from having his name linked to a terrorist plot that he wants to remain anonymous.
He told me how Old Trafford had cropped up in his interrogation: "I was in the police station and the interview stopped, like a rest, and somebody, they bring in the coffee and they ask me what you like? I say I like the football. Oh, who do you support? They ask me just like a friendly, who do you support? I say Manchester United. Oh, how long you support Manchester United? I said a long time I support Manchester United, when I was tiny, I was small, you know and all my family supported Manchester United ... they asked me, have you been football ground? I said, of course I've been to the football ground. Two years ago, long time ago, I can't remember."
These questions were surely prompted by the discovery, at the anonymous suspect's flat, of Manchester United paraphernalia: a poster of Old Trafford, and ticket stubs the suspect had kept as souvenirs of his only visit to the ground, when he had gone with a friend to watch United play Arsenal the year before.
The two friends had bought their tickets from touts, which meant that they sat at different parts of the ground.
The Sun reported that the bombers planned to sit at different parts of the ground, in order to cause maximum damage with their bombs. This claim can only have been based on the fact that the old ticket stubs found by the police were for seats in different parts of the stadium. This information had not been made public, so The Sun could only have obtained it from the police.
The Kurds I spoke to had come to Britain in order to escape the brutality of Saddam Hussein's regime. Perhaps their most meaningful emotional connection with Britain was a love for Manchester United, which was why they kept the souvenirs in their flat.
The Manchester police discovered nothing else suspicious.
Nevertheless the police probably viewed the Manchester United souvenirs as potential evidence of a bomb plot. This evidence was then prematurely leaked, through unofficial police sources, to the press.
Manchester police then encouraged the story to run by issuing public statements that, while falling a long way short of giving outright confirmation, could be read as corroborating the story.
Disgracefully, the Greater Manchester Police refused to launch an investigation into the numerous leaks.The reporting of this incident was inflammatory and misleading. It caused needless alarm among millions of TV viewers and newspaper readers. It stirred up anti-Islamic prejudice. It ruined the lives of several of the suspects. They lost their homes, their jobs and their friends as a result. They have never received a personal apology, either from the police or from the press.
source:
http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/104841
===
-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW
_______________________________________________ is-lam mailing list [email protected] http://milis.isnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/is-lam
