http://musliminsuffer.wordpress.com/
bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful
=== News Update ===
SADDAM'S GOODBYE CURSE
January 08, 2007
Eric S. Margolis
The Bush/Cheney Administration has never concealed its sneering contempt
for international law or world public opinion. Even so, the lynching of
President Saddam Hussein of Iraq established a new nadir for America and
shocked the entire globe.
This sordid act, which grossly violated international law, the Geneva
Conventions, and basic human decency, provoked a well-deserved storm of
criticism around the globe against the Bush/Cheney Administration. It also
rekindled demands for an international abolition of the death penalty.
Washington professed surprise and denied blame for this disgusting
spectacle. More lies. Saddam had been under US guard in a US-run prison in
Baghdad's US-run Green Zone. He was transferred under US guard to a US-run
execution prison. What did US officials think would happen when they turned
him over to a raging lynch mob of vengeful Shias? A parade?
The United States has already been heavily criticized for stage-managing
the Soviet-style show trial and rigged kangaroo court that condemned Saddam
and two of his closest henchmen.
It's clear Iraq's deposed leader was hurriedly executed to prevent him from
revealing embarrassing details about his long collusion with the US,
Britain, and Arab states.
Saddam's principal crime was launching an unprovoked war against Iran that
cost over one million casualties. This crime was never mentioned in
President Hussein's trial because, at the time, his principal accomplices
were the United States, Britain and the Arab oil monarchs. Dead men tell no
tales.
Ironically, Saddam's courage and dignity on the gallows will reinforce his
claim to martyrdom and make him the hero in death that he certainly was not
in life. This process has already begun.
By contrast, the UN's new South Korean secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, who
was maneuvered into office by Washington, shamefully supported Saddam's
execution even though the UN has long opposed the death penalty, and its
human rights chief, Louise Arbour, had condemned the brutal execution .
This was an inauspicious start for a timid yes-man.
This week, the Bush/Cheney Administration is widely expected to announce
plans to deploy another 20,000 or more troops to Iraq and allocate billions
more for the war effort and economic reconstruction. This will be George
Bush's petulant reply to the bipartisan Iraq Study Group's wise proposal
that all US combat forces withdraw from Iraq within a year.
Senior American generals charged with Iraq, including Gen. John Abazaid and
Gen. George Casey, openly disagreed with Bush's plans for a `surge' in US
troop deployment. These able officers told media they didn't need more
troops. They warned additional US troops would deter Iraq's Shia regime
from developing its own security forces and keep it dependant on the US and
death squads.
These statements were a shocker. American generals are not supposed to
publicly disagree with the president. Both officers have just been replaced
in command. Gen. Abazaid, who speaks Arabic and understands Iraq, is
retiring early, in disgust, say friends.
Casey and Abazaid follow another fine officer, former Army Chief of Staff
Eric Shinseki, who choose duty to America over career. He was forced to
retire by the White House after publicly stating a minimum of 300,000 US
troops would be needed to pacify Iraq. The 140,000 US troops currently in
Iraq, and the 80,000 or so mercenaries(`civilian contractors' in Pentagon
and media doublespeak) supporting them, are stretched to the breaking point
and hard pressed to defend their own bases and vulnerable supply lines.
Iraq's western Anbar Province has become a Ft Apache for the US Marines,
who are barely able to defend their own besieged bases. Iraq's Sunni
resistance forces have almost defeated American forces there in spite of
massed US air, artillery, and armor support.
Many US senior military officers privately say it is small wonder Bush, who
styles himself the `war president,' is so deficient in military experience
and knowledge. A few months in the Texas Air National Guard evading wartime
military service during Vietnam certainly did not prepare him to wage two
wars. The real power behind the throne, VP Dick Cheney, also avoided
military service, claiming he was `too busy.'
Responsible presidents know when to listen to their generals, and when to
retreat from stalemated or lost wars. If Bush does send thousands more
troops to Iraq, he will be risking more American lives in a desperate,
11th-hour political gamble to show voters he has a new plan to resolve the
horrible mess in Iraq that he created.
The White House's last gamble may call for stationing the new troops in and
around Baghdad to end the anarchy in Iraq's capitol and reinforcing
embattled US units in Anbar Province.
But most of the new troops will come from US units currently in Iraq that
were due to be withdrawn, or are US-based troops slated for deployment to
Iraq. Morale among US occupation forces is already rock bottom. This news
about delayed departures and accelerated deployments could ignite the same
kind of malaise and indiscipline experienced by US troops in the later part
of the lost Vietnam War. It could also get yet more US troops stuck in the
Iraqi quagmire.
But 20,000-30,000 more US troops thrown into the cauldron of Iraq will make
little military difference. One hundred fifty thousand or more might, but
the US has run out of soldiers. Even massive reinforcements will not
resolve the basic problem of Iraq's post-Saddam political instability and
the inability of its component groups to forge national consensus.
If Bush pours more troops into this a lost war, he will fall into the trap
of many bad gamblers who double up their bets in a reckless effort to
recoup previous losses.
Bush continues ignoring his generals while still heeding the siren song of
the pro-Israel neoconservatives around him. Their goal is not a stable
Mideast, but total destruction of Iraq, then Iran.
Current Republican presidential front-runner Sen. John McCain has joined
Bush and Cheney in urging more troop be sent to Iraq. All three have
clearly lost touch with reality and America's basic values.
Call it Saddam's curse.
source:
http://www.ericmargolis.com/archives/2007/01/saddamas_goodby.php
===
-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW
_______________________________________________
is-lam mailing list
[email protected]
http://milis.isnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/is-lam
