I don't mind one way or the other, but also wonder if it is worth it - I
will certainly not rush in to change it.
Tobias
Lawrence Paulson schrieb:
> Obviously this proposal would involve a significant incompatibility. It may
> not even be very relevant any more, as this sort of instantiation is rather
> out of fashion. But it is worth a discussion.
> Larry
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> I would propose to simplify the parsing rules to work like this: Any
>> variable name with index 0 can be referred to without a question mark
>> or dot, and a dot is always required for indices other than 0.
>>
>> x, ?x and ?x.0 parse as ("x", 0)
>> x0, ?x0 and ?x0.0 parse as ("x0", 0)
>> x2, ?x2 and ?x2.0 parse as ("x2", 0)
>> ?x.2 parses as ("x", 2)
>
> _______________________________________________
> isabelle-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
_______________________________________________
isabelle-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
