On 01/04/2012 10:19 PM, Makarius wrote:
The difference of a fully integrated release bundle and "a development
snapshot" is increasing more and more -- since the bundles are getting
so advanced. I would not like to see the clear distinction between
production quality releases and arbitrary snapshots diluted. Some users
might even think that a snapshot is always the latest and greatest
thing, while in reality it ages much faster than proper releases.

This raises the question what the role of the old "development snapshots" is. I have not used one myself for many years, and I think their existence is mostly historic (In the old days, a TUM account was required to be able to check out the CVS repository, so the snapshots were the only way of sharing non-releases with the outside world).

So the general tendency would be to deemphasize these snapshots and recommend the actual source repository for developers (and AFP maintainers) and packaged releases for everybody else.

But Larry's concern is still valid: Perhaps the solution is to provide a release candidate early on, together with an announcement of the changes.

Alex
_______________________________________________
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev

Reply via email to