On 29/03/2012, at 6:11 AM, Makarius wrote:

> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Florian Haftmann wrote:
> 
>> Once there has been the idea that everyone having commit access to the 
>> Isabelle master repository (POSIX group isabelle at nfsbroy) is also a 
>> isatest subscriber.
>> 
>> Maybe it would be helpful to establish this as a rule (at least of thumb).  
>> Isatest mails can still be sorted out by local email filters.
>> 
>> What do you think?
> 
> I could imagine some reforms in the meaning of the Unix group "isabelle" and 
> how it is managed, although I have a tendency to leave the status-quo 
> untouched.
> 
> For every administrative facility that is added, one also needs to take 
> maintenance into account. 

Yes, that is the main problem I see with this (otherwise I'm all for it). If 
there is an email list that automatically contains everyone with push-access, 
emails could easily be sent there. I wouldn't want to have to maintain that 
email list, tough.


> Who is the main responsible for isatest anyway?  According to the received 
> customs it would be Gerwin, since he started the service many years ago. (His 
> shell scripts still mention SunOS.)

They do ;-)

I still feel mildly responsible for isatest, but would be more than happy to 
pass this on to somebody with more time and more close in time(zone) and and 
space to where it actually runs.

Cheers,
Gerwin

_______________________________________________
isabelle-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev

Reply via email to