On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, Dmitriy Traytel wrote:

Stripping did not work (even on lxbroy10 with some older Mercurial). However, Johannes managed to apparently fix everything by doing a fresh clone, copying some files (such as hgrc) and adjusting permissions (cf. https://isabelle.in.tum.de/community/Reconstructing_the_Isabelle_repository).

This is a serious problem, not just in a technical sense.

Why is there again this diverging clone of important administrative information? So the community wiki is not about Isabelle community at all, but to make administration harder by putting unreliable information snippets on a virtual whiteboard. It actually causes dis-unity not com-unity.


When I did the re-cloning last time, I documented it explicitly in http://isabelle.in.tum.de/repos/isabelle/rev/71136069089d see also http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02978.html

Our main tools for Isabelle development are the repistory and the isabelel-dev mailing list. I am not even a user of the Isabelle community wiki, and will not maintain all this divergence of clones.


We probably also need to rethink the hosting problem of the conventional push-area for the central clone of the Isabelle reposity. A single dropout every 2 years would be acceptable, but not several times in 1 year. Maybe there is a chance to discuss it with Franz Huber next week, and a solution without home-made servers. Otherwise we need an external hosting service, which is relatively easy. It will be reletively hard to sort out the administrative structure, though, since we are still stuck in the "everybody is root" paradigm stemming from CVS 1.0.


        Makarius
_______________________________________________
isabelle-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev

Reply via email to