On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Johannes Hölzl wrote:
It looks like the problem is somewhere in the call to
Classical.inst0_step_tac in nodup_depth_tac (clasimp.ML):
---- clasimp.ML ----
fun nodup_depth_tac ctxt m i st =
SELECT_GOAL
(Classical.safe_steps_tac ctxt 1 THEN_ELSE
(DEPTH_SOLVE (nodup_depth_tac ctxt m 1),
Classical.inst0_step_tac ctxt 1 APPEND COND (K (m = 0)) no_tac
(slow_step_tac' ctxt 1 THEN DEPTH_SOLVE (nodup_depth_tac ctxt (m - 1)
1)))) i st;
-----------------------
Dmitriy and I tried to simplify the testcase by replicating the goal on
which inst0_step_tac is called but could not replicated the failure.
* How can I activate backtraces in ML to get an better understand of the
problem? I tried declare [[ML_trace = true]] but I didn't get a
backtrace.
ML_trace is only for the static phase, to say what is the actual ML source
after expanding antiquotations.
In principle ML "Toplevel.debug := true" gives you an exception trace
(only visible on "Raw Output"), but it is hidden behind lazy sequence
evaluation here. So you should try the exception_trace combinator in the
deeper parts of the ML code, where you suspect a problem.
Makarius_______________________________________________
isabelle-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
