Hi Chris,
any opinions on making the type of monadic bind more general (see the attached patch)?
Generalizing bind itself would rather be a topic for ICFP or POPL, and I cannot comment on that :-) Concerning the constant that represents it syntactically, I would say that if it does not break anything then it is fine. After all, this is just ad-hoc overloading, so generalizations can also be ad-hoc.
I tested the change against IsaFoR (which makes heavy use of Monad_Syntax). Unfortunately, running JinjaThreads (which also uses Monad_Syntax) timed out on my machine (hopefully not due to the patch). Could anybody with access to a more powerful machine check this please?
Pushed to testboard, which should run it on decent hardware: http://isabelle.in.tum.de/testboard/Isabelle/rev/eeff8139b3d8 Alex _______________________________________________ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
