But working very well, in my experience.

Now, will smt2 calls be suitable for the Library and AFP?

Larry

On 6 Mar 2014, at 15:43, Jasmin Christian Blanchette 
<jasmin.blanche...@gmail.com> wrote:

> As you may know, Sascha and I have been working on a new version of the "smt" 
> proof method, called "smt2". It is effectively a clone of "smt", but with the 
> Z3 interaction (problem generation, proof parsing, and reconstruction) 
> rewritten from scratch, with the following short-term goals:
> 
> 1. Use SMT-LIB 2 instead of 1.
> 2. Support newer versions of Z3 (> 4.0).
> 3. Produce Isar proofs from Z3 proofs.
> 
> It is still highly experimental

_______________________________________________
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev

Reply via email to