Okay Fabian and I discovered the following problems when one defines a
type class which contains a constant which is not a function:
1. If there is a type class which contains data depending on the type
classes variable, i.e.
class test_class =
fixes test :: "'a filter"
Then the dictionary construction for type constructors does not
work in ML! The type signature would be the following:
val test_prod : ('a * 'b) filter
Which apparently is not allow in ML.
2. If your type class contains non-computable data, i.e.
instantiation bool :: test_class
begin
definition "test = if P = NP then top else bot"
instance proof qed
end
You get a non-terminating program at the time point when the
dictionary for bool :: test_class is constructed. When the
code equation is hidden with [code del] one gets a exception!
3. Our current solution is to introduce code_datatype Abs_filter
Rep_filter [code del] and define for each uniformity:
uniformity = Abs_filter (%P. Code.abort (STR''FAILED'') (Rep_filter test
P))
@Florian: is the an alternative solution?
- Johannes
PS: Here is a short, concrete example:
theory Scratch
imports Complex_Main
begin
class test_class =
fixes test :: "'a filter"
instantiation prod :: (test_class, test_class) test_class
begin
definition [code del]: "test = (test ×⇩F test :: ('a × 'b) filter)"
instance proof qed
end
instantiation unit :: test_class
begin
definition [code del]:
"(test :: unit filter) = bot"
instance proof qed
end
definition "test2 (x::'a::test_class) = (Suc 0)"
definition "test3 = test2 ((), ())"
value [code] "test3"
section ‹Solution›
code_datatype Abs_filter
declare [[code abort: Rep_filter]]
lemma test_Abort: "test = Abs_filter (λP. Code.abort (STR ''test'')
(λx. Rep_filter test P))"
unfolding Code.abort_def Rep_filter_inverse ..
declare test_Abort[where 'a="'a::test_class * 'b :: test_class", code]
declare test_Abort[where 'a=unit, code]
end
Am Freitag, den 08.01.2016, 09:56 +0100 schrieb Johannes Hölzl:
> Hi,
>
> I want to introduce uniform spaces in HOL, for this I need to
> introduce
> a type class of the form (see the attached bundle):
>
> class uniformity =
> fixes uniformity :: "('a × 'a) filter"
>
> Note that uniformity is a filter and not a function.
>
> which sits between topological spaces and metric spaces, i.e. every
> metric type is also in the following type classes:
>
> class open_uniformity = "open" + uniformity +
> assumes open_uniformity: "⋀U. open U ⟷ (∀x∈U. eventually (λ(x',
> y). x' = x ⟶ y ∈ U) uniformity)"
>
> class uniformity_dist = dist + uniformity +
> assumes uniformity_dist: "uniformity = (INF e:{0 <..}. principal
> {(x, y). dist x y < e})"
>
> Everything works fine until Affinite_Arithmetic, there in
> Intersection.thy the code generation fails with the following ML
> error:
>
> Error: Type mismatch in type constraint.
> Value: {uniformity = uniformity_proda} : {uniformity: 'a}
> Constraint: ('a * 'b) uniformity
> Reason:
> Can't unify 'a to (('a * 'b) * ('a * 'b)) filter
> (Type variable is free in surrounding scope)
> {uniformity = uniformity_proda} : ('a * 'b) uniformity
> At (line 1619 of "generated code")
> Exception- Fail "Static Errors" raised
>
> I assume this is a strange interaction btw code_abort and the fact
> that
> uniformity is a filter (datatype 'a filter = _EMPTY) and not a
> function.
>
> Does anybody know how to avoid such kind of errors? Do I need to
> sprinkle more [code del] or code_abort annotations?
>
> - Johannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> isabelle-dev mailing list
> isabelle-...@in.tum.de
> https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabel
> le-dev
_______________________________________________
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
