We never promised that the new test infrastructure would guarantee that nobody will break the repository anymore. You are perfectly aware of this. So stop trolling.

Tobias


On 19/10/2016 13:52, Makarius wrote:
On 19/10/16 13:38, Lars Hupel wrote:
Oh, nothing went wrong: Jenkins sent an email immediately after the
push, and the status page also indicated the failure. Automation working
as expected.

But that did not help. Florian experienced the broken repository just in
the way it occasionally happens.

The open question is if the massive use of CPU resources by Jenkins is
justified to deliver its service. It is still unclear to me what this
service is in the first place.

So far there were only axioms about Jenkins, but no proofs.


        Makarius

_______________________________________________
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev

Reply via email to