As I recall, this constant originally comes from HOL Light and is used in a
couple of proofs.
And it occurs to me that it might be a good way of dealing with HOL Light’s
generalisation of summations and limits to sets of natural numbers. As I ported
the PNT, I used two other methods of dealing with that problem.
At the moment I don’t regard it as heavily used, but I guess it depends on what
one is working on at any one time.
I would rather have qualified names than completely arbitrary variations of the
> On 30 Jun 2017, at 15:57, Manuel Eberl <ebe...@in.tum.de> wrote:
> Still, I for one think this is not really worth the trouble of keeping an
> entirely separate constant around, especially because "subseq h" does not
> make much sense: "h" itself is not a subsequence of anything, "f ∘ h" is a
> sub-sequence of "f".
> It would be interesting to know what other users of Complex_Main think about
isabelle-dev mailing list