> On 16 Jan 2018, at 14:13, Blanchette, J.C. <j.c.blanche...@vu.nl> wrote: > > However, for operators like ==>, which bind on the right, > > foo ==> > bar > > is actually much more readable than > > foo > ==> bar
This sort of claim needs to be justified by evidence. We had it the first way until the late 1990s. I changed it to the other way while working on large proof states connected with crypto protocols. It seemed more readable to me for such proofs. > foo ==> bar > ==> baz As for this last example, we definitely need the earlier syntax [|foo; bar|] ==> baz, which has been made almost impossible to enable. Larry _______________________________________________ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
