We had already discussed this and decided that for "=", "<=" etc it makes sense.

I find that the wrong associativity can be much more of a killer than where the infix op is placed.

Tobias

On 22/02/2019 17:20, Lawrence Paulson wrote:
The pretty printing of infix operators looks pretty terrible in the presence of 
large terms.

I’d like to propose having infix operators breaking at the start of the line 
rather than at the end. Any thoughts?

Larry

inv⇘homology_group 0 (nsphere 0)⇙ hom_induced 0 (subtopology (nsphere 0) {pp}) 
{} (nsphere 0) {} r
                                        d =
     hom_induced 0 (subtopology (nsphere 0) {nn}) {} (nsphere 0) {} id
      (hom_induced 0 (subtopology (nsphere 0) {pp}) {} (subtopology (nsphere 0) 
{nn}) {} r
        (inv⇘homology_group 0 (subtopology (nsphere 0) {pp})⇙ d))
_______________________________________________
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev

Reply via email to