I didn’t use the document, but I certainly noticed the new theories. I always 
try to put material as close to the root of the tree as possible.
Larry

> On 22 Mar 2019, at 17:19, Fabian Immler <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 3/22/2019 8:51 AM, Lawrence Paulson wrote:
> > But we can easily see a pattern now, with more or less abstract topology 
> > being developed before integration theory, complex analysis, winding 
> > numbers and other horrors. This may suggest a division of Analysis, maybe 
> > even before the next release.
> 
> I would like to take the opportunity to advertise this observation as a 
> success of the efforts of everyone who contributed to tagging HOL-Analysis.
> 
> The resulting document [1] (e.g. for isabelle/35ba13ac6e5c) helped to clarify 
> the dependencies of a lot of (elementary) material that was hidden in between 
> "other horrors" and sort it into the right places (currently chapter 1-4).
> 
> I believe this helped Larry to install the new material into appropriate 
> places such that we can now see a bit more structure in the previously 
> amorphous HOL-Analysis.
> 
> Fabian
> 
> 
> [1] 
> https://ci.isabelle.systems/jenkins/job/isabelle-all/ws/browser_info/HOL/HOL-Analysis/manual.pdf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> isabelle-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman46.in.tum.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev

_______________________________________________
isabelle-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman46.in.tum.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev

Reply via email to