On 27/04/2020 11:23, Lawrence Paulson wrote:
But looking more closely, the specific proposal (regardless of the implementation) is excellent: it is simply an “at most one” quantifier, which we also need in Isabelle/HOL, and I’m wondering that I didn’t grasp the need for this 30 years ago.
I don't recall feeling the need for it, although I may just be too used to what we have to conceive of notions beyond. But I have (almost) never seen it anywhere else. There are of course the counting quantifiers.
Having said that, I wouldn't object to an "at most one" quantifier provided it has a decent syntax. See https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1205464/quantifier-for-there-is-at-most-one
Tobias
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ isabelle-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman46.in.tum.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
