On 16/10/2010 21:36, Alexander Krasnukhin wrote:
I think wiki is definitely the wrong place to discuss something. It's too
easy to loose track. Forum is OK but maillist is much better.
Agreed, we should conduct discussions through the mailing list, because
the mailing list gets archived and is where discussions and if necessary
votes occur; that's the "Apache Way". I don't have a problem with a
page on the wiki with the post cross-referencing it, but I think it
should be clearly signposted from the mailing list. And probably
copied-n-pasted too.
It's much
easier to write email than login& post on forum. But discussion RESULTS
must be definitely posted somewhere in wiki.
Just my opinion.
Perhaps our mentors might contribute on what's worked best on other
projects they've been involved with?
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Kevin Meyer - KMZ<[email protected]> wrote:
Going forward - where is the best forum to discuss, for example, that
is seems that "Optional" is only available as an annotation - but I'd like
to discuss adding it as a runtime method (like disabledXXX) so that I
can set a parameter as optional at runtime?
Likewise, to resume the discussion about service contributed actions
and service disabledXXXX?
Should all that happen via the isis-dev mailing list? The wiki? Or a
forum?
Regards,
Kevin
