On 20/10/2010 14:55, Robert Matthews wrote:
I already tried this after I emailed you. Although it changes the name
of the projects properly it doesn't name the referenced projects
properly - so it doesn't build.
Works for me.
What is it that doesn't work exactly for you? The only thing I've found
might be an issue is the .launch files in the examples which reference
the project name.
As there is only one project involved I suggest we rename one of the
artifactIds so that our code works in widest possible number of
configurations, ie I don't think we should dictate that one uses one
plug-in over another.
There will be several "applibs" when my sister projects are added in:
the original applib, headless applib, restful applib, groovy applib,
wicket applib, at least. So I'd prefer to find a way of working that
supports artifacts with the same names, rather than hack around it.
Dan
Rob
On 20/10/10 14:19, Dan Haywood wrote:
I have a better solution; when importing into m2eclipse, specify the
"name template" to include the groupId:artifactId.
Here's how:
1. File > Import
2. On the next dialog, Maven > Existing Maven Projects
3. On the next dialog
a) open up advanced, and for name template, select
"[groupId].[artifactId]"
b) specify root directory
c) refresh
d) import
If you prefer to use mvn eclipse:eclipse to generate the
.project/.classpath, then it is (see [1]):
mvn eclipse:eclipse
-Declipse.projectNameTemplate="[groupId].[artifactId]"
I'll add that configuration to the root POM.
Make sense?
Dan
[1]
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/2.5.8+Maven+Eclipse+Plugin+Goals#2.5.8MavenEclipsePluginGoals-CustomizingtheNameoftheGeneratedProjects
On 20/10/2010 14:13, Robert Matthews wrote:
Dan
Our naming policy has caused a problem in Eclipse where multiple
project with same name (eg progmodel) cannot be accommodated by it.
We have three POMs with the same artifcact ID, two of which are
Java/jar modules (the other is POM and doesn't seem to affect
things). The eclipse plugin uses the artifact name for the Eclipse
project name and therefore ends up with two projects with the same
name.
Ideally we should change one of the module's artifact ID.
Rob
