Hmm I'd rather see an IRC meeting. Voice meetings tend to get hard to understand if the connection is poor. IRC meetings also can be logged and posted to the list afterwards.
It's the apache way that most things / decision making happens on the mailing list so all steps are visible to the outside also. The recent story of Oracle vs Google backs this approach. LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 11/9/10, Kevin Meyer <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Kevin Meyer <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Regular Skype conf. calls? > To: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2010, 6:55 AM > My 2c: > I definitely don't have the bandwidth for video, but would > be > interested in attending by voice. > Again, depends on date and time zone. At the moment I > dedicate > Mondays to full-time non-contract work (i.e. Mondays are > good for me) > and for personal reasons would prefer something between > 08h00 to 16h00, > GMT+2. If it's not a Monday, then after 18h00 GMT+2 would > be preferred. > Obviously, exceptions can be made... ;) > > What freeware apps support shared desktop/applications for > such a > group call? If anyone wants to demo something, for > example. > I may not have the bandwidth (between 20 and 40kB/s on a > good day, > 100ms to 200ms latency). > > For documentation purposes, can anyone record the audio? > I guess, also, someone would have to take minutes! This > requires > an agenda? Urk... > > > On Tue, November 9, 2010 00:52, Dan Haywood wrote: > > There's been a few off-list conversations (between > Nour, Siegfried and > > myself, at least) about having regular virtual get > togethers on Skype. > > Now that Skype [1] has group video conferencing, I > think this would be a > > good way to help the community develop. > > > > Questions: > > 1. do we think it'd be good idea? and if so... > > 2. how often ought we to do this? > > 3. what time of the day ought we to have the call? > > > > >
