It's not come back to me yet, but I think it was at NOG, so I'll have a
look at how they are doing it and see if it's related.
Rob
On 22/11/10 10:20, dan haywood wrote:
Primarily so that we can build docbook when offline. Also, for speed (for
those of us on low bandwidth connections).
On 22 November 2010 10:18, Robert Matthews<[email protected]>wrote:
Can you remind me why we are referencing the DTD locally rather than
online? I Have vague memories about the XML documentation where this kind
of thing was a problem, but we managed to solve it locally (and simply).
Regards
Rob
On 20/11/10 17:42, Kevin Meyer - KMZ wrote:
Guys,
With Dan's last use of svn:externals to replicate copies of the
documentation resources (images and the DTD files) means that an
"svn up ." takes more than 15 minutes on my system - each directory
query takes between 15 to 20 seconds, and there are 63 directories
queried..
Since each directory is just a copy of the same source directory, can't
we instead have a script (or some other copying tool) to just copy the
3 directories (docbkx/dtd-4.5, docbkx/style and docbkx/images) into
each destination?
Thus, I am requesting that only the main resource directory is fetched
from subversion (into, for example, trunk/src/docbkx/*), and some
other tool copy it from the local location into the required local
dependent project directories?
I would settle for a simple (shell/command) script, but I realize this
could become a maintenance nightmare - better if maven manages
the copying, is this possible?
Regards,
Kevin
