[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-68?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dan Haywood resolved ISIS-68.
-----------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.1.0-incubating
This was addressed alongside changes for ISIS-64 and ISIS-65.
> Combine JavaSpecification and JavaIntrospector, and make the mechanism for
> ordering members more explicit.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISIS-68
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-68
> Project: Isis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core: MetaModel
> Reporter: Dan Haywood
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.1.0-incubating
>
>
> There is no real separation of responsibilities between JavaSpecification and
> JavaIntrospector... the responsibility for introspecting is really a
> responsibility of the FacetFactories that make up the programming model in
> action. These two classes should therefore be combined.
> In addition, the JavaIntrospector currently takes responsibility for applying
> the ordering of members. In the future we might want to make this a
> "post-processing" operation, in effect overlaying a UI "schema" for the
> layout of object members. (The MetaWidget library does something like this,
> to good effect).
> As a first step, we should make clear the raw set of associations/actions;
> and then make clear the transformation of these sets into ordered/laid out
> sets.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
