Since we only staged the builds and didn't ship it to final, we can also drop the old branches again. I'd just let the tags. In theory we would not even need the tags anymore.
LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 6/7/11, Dan Haywood <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Dan Haywood <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache Isis release candidate > 0.1.2-RC3-incubating > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 7:22 AM > Hi Kevin, > I'm creating a new branch each time I do an RC; it's all > documented in the contributors guide. > Per that invalid version ref in site.XML, this is something > that will need to be manually edited each time a release is > cut (along with a couple of other files that I already knew > about). I've documented this reqt to update site.XML in the > contrib guide, so next tome round it'd should get addressed. > > > Once we get this first release done, I was thinking it > might be good if someone else, eg you or Rob, did the next > release. It's not that I mind doing the releases, but it'd > help us know that the contrib guide is correct and missing > no steps. > > Cheers, Dan > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 7 Jun 2011, at 07:50, "Kevin Meyer" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Dan, > > > > I assume you're working with a subversion branch? > > > > Before you announce the next vote, do you want to let > us know which > > branch/.. you're using? It can give (us/me) a chance > to make minor > > changes, if required - e.g. fixing the > src/site/pom.xml version. > > > > Regards, > > Kevin > > > > > > On Mon, June 6, 2011 22:12, Dan Haywood wrote: > >> [sigh] > >> > >> Thanks, Mark, though, for your time in checking > through the release. I > >> had completely missed that LGPL dependency on XOM, > which is really > >> annoying. I need to change some source code > to remove that dependency, > >> so the next RC might be delayed til I do that. > >> > > > > >
